GMAT作文精品模板推荐(5).

刚刚更新编辑：浏览次数：283 移动端

　　想要迅速提升GMAT作文的写作水平，考生首先需要参考大量的GMAT作文模板，并以此为基础不断总结，从而掌握GMAT作文的写作规律。下面澳际留学就来为大家推荐一些GMAT作文的精品模板，希望能够为考生备考GMAT作文考试带来帮助。更多相关问题可咨询澳际留学在线专家，如果有任何意见和建议，也请联系我们。

　　shmilyqiqi的AA Tip：

　　1. 我用的是800分大牛tonyadidas的AA 模版，但根据实际经验，对各段稍作精简(把拗口的一些词、句式去掉)，再排了序(挑出常考到的高频理由)。

　　2. AA无需它法，只要把这些理由背熟!我复习AWA时间很少，但这些理由到现在还能脱口而出，靠平时上下班路上边想边背、反反复复背。

　　3. 画线处为经典的段首、尾句式，请务必背熟、灵活运用!因为各段内容可以现编，也常常编的是废话反复说，但有了这样漂亮的段首、尾来保障结构，就安全多了。

　　非常经典的开头、结尾――看完题目就开始直接打这两段，边打边想理由!

　　(经典)开头段模板 The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that…. Several reasons are offered in support of this argument. First of all, the author points out that…. In addition, the author reasons that… (What’s more, he also assumes that …) At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further rlection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A carul examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.

　　(经典)结尾段模板To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that…. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author would have to show that…. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that…. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal. (结尾中复述的理由就copy/paste开头中的理由)

　　高频理由(按频率由高到低排列)

　　时序性因果攻击Firstly, the author is engaged in ‘after this, therore, because of this’ reasoning. The line of reasoning is that because A happened bore B, the former caused the latter. However, this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C. As a result, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of B must be based on a more thorough investigation to gather data in order to narrow down and locate the actual cause of B.

　　同时性因果攻击Secondly, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that A is the cause of B just because A coincided with B. However, a mere positional correlation does not necessarily prove a causal relationship. In addition, all other prospective causes of B, such as C and D, must be ruled out. Without detailed analysis of the real source of B, it would be groundless to attribute B to A.

　　错误类比攻击Additionally, it is highly doubtful that strategies drawn from A are applicable to B. However, differences between these two clearly outweigh the similarities, therore making the analogy much less valid. For example, C and D all affect A but virtually absent in B. Accordingly, we can see that A and B are so dissimilar that B is unlikely to experience the same consequence if it adopts A’s strategies.

　　非此即彼攻击Last but not least, the author unfairly assumes that a reader must make a either-or choice. However, the argument fails to rule out possibility that adjusting A and B might produce better results. Moreover, if the author is wrong in the assumption that A and B are the only causes of the problem, thus the most fective solution might include a complex of other factors—such as C and D. In any event, the author provides no justification for the mutually exclusive choice imposed on the reader.

　　必要性攻击In the first place, the author unfairly assumes that B was determined solely by A. While A is a seemingly important element in determining B, it is hardly the only or even necessarily required element. This assumption overlooks other crucial criteria in determining B—such as C, D. Without accounting for these potential factors, the author concludes too hastily that …is the best way to achieve goals.

　　充分性攻击In the second place, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that A is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals. However, if it turns out that B is due to a combination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, such as C and D, only A might have no impact on B.

　　选择性样本攻击 A threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic. The example cited, while suggestive of this trend, is insufficient to warrant that the sample is representative of the whole group. For example, I question that…Therore, such evidence would be obviously unrepresentative. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious for the author to draw any conclusion at all.

　　(与“选择性样本攻击”较类似) 样本代表性攻击Moreover, a possible methodology problem in the argument is that it is of bias. The term ‘so many’ is too vague to be statistically meaningful. It is very possible that workers who were more interested in the survey might be likely to respond to the questionnaire. Lacking in the information about the number of workers surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey. For instance, if 1000 workers were surveyed but only 10 responded, the result should be highly suspect. Because the author fails to account for other interpretations, the survey would be useless in concluding that….

　　以上为大家推荐了一些GMAT作文考试的实用模板，考生可以适当参考，并通过大量的写作练习来逐步提高自己的GMAT作文的写作水平，从而在GMAT考试中取得更好的成绩。