GMAT逻辑总结分享.

　　很多同学在做了一段GMAT逻辑后，往往会发现正确率并没有得到有效的提高，原因往往就是由于没有进行有效的GMAT逻辑总结，其中通过总结，我们往往能够发现我们的问题所在，为此澳际小编特选择一道题目的进行GMAT逻辑总结，希望对各位有所帮助。

●●点击获取更多专业名师一对一咨询、免费网上增值服务●●

　　我们用一道题目来进行GMAT逻辑总结。大家可以先自己做一做，再好好体会一下为什么能选对，或为什么会选错。

　　Veteran screenwriters, aiming at creating a 120-page screenplay for a film, usually turn in a 135-page first draft. As one screenwriter put it, “That gives those in charge of the movie a chance to be creative when they get the script: at the very least, they can cut 15 pages. ”

　　The screenwriter’s statement cited above conveys which of the following propositions?

　　A. Screenwriters for a film are generally not involved in any aspects of filmmaking besides providing the script

　　B. Seasoned screenwriters are resigned to, and make allowance for, draft scripts being altered by those evaluating them

　　C. Truly creative screen writers are too temperamental to adhere to page limits set for their work

　　D. It takes a special kind of creativity to recognize what is best lt out of a film script

　　E. Even experienced screenwriters cannot be expected to write scripts of consistently high quality throughout.

　　这道题的干扰选项较多，甚至有的同学认为每个选项都有道理!其实不然，如果各位能够对GMAT逻辑归纳题进行总结就会发现，它是有固定的解题套路的。选A，说明原文没看懂;选B，说明抓住了原文末句改写而且也不怕改得直接;选C说明大概看懂了但没抓住点子;选D说明基本看懂了但没掌握技巧;选E说明该收一收了，发散了!“故意多写15页”是否等于“写出了质量不高的作品”?

　　总之，希望各位考生能够通过GMAT逻辑总结，找出自己最弱的点，并冲最弱的点出发，将自己身上的“顽疾”克服，要相信，GMAT逻辑通过套路的总结和认真的演练，是完全可以打个漂亮仗的!