gmat写作模板,统一与分歧5篇.

　　以下我们为大家准备了gmat写作模板，题目是统一与分歧，还是gmat考试比较常出现的话题，gmat写作模板一共五篇，供大家参考。切忌模板不可照搬背诵，看看写作思路而已，仅供参考。

　　"Everywhere, it seems, there are clear and positive signs that people are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences. "

　　In your opinion, how accurate is the view expressed above? Use reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading to develop your position.

　　In determining whether we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences, one must examine overt actions and underlying motives, as well as examining whether our differences are increasing or decreasing. The issue, therore, is quite complex, and the answer is unclear.

　　Disrespect for one another&aposs differences manifests itself in various forms of prejudice and discrimination. Since the civil rights arid feminist movements of the 60s and 70s, it would seem that we have made significant progress toward eliminating racial and sexual discrimination. Antidiscriminatory laws in the areas of employment housing, and education, now protect all significant minority groups-racial minorities and women, the physically challenged and, more recently, homosexuals. Movies and television shows, which for better or worse have become the cynosure of our cultural attention, now tout the rights of minorities, encouraging acceptance of and respect for others.

　　However much of this progress is forced upon us legislatively. Without Title 10 and its progenies, would we voluntarily rrain from the discriminatory behavior that the laws prevent? Perhaps not. Moreover, signs of disrespect are all around us today. Extreme factions still rally around bigoted | demagogues; the number of "hate crimes" is increasing alarmingly; and school-age children seem to ^flaunt a disrespect toward adults as never bore. Finally, what appears to be respect for one another&aposs differences may in fact be an increasing global homogeneity-mat is, we are becoming more and more Hike.

　　In sum, on a societal level it is difficult to distinguish between genuine respect for one another&aposs differences on the one hand and legislated morality and increasing homogeneity on the other. Accordingly, the claim that we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences is somewhat dubious.

　　"What education fails to teach us is to see the human community as one. Rather than focus on the unique differences that separate one nation from another, education should focus on the similarities among all people and places on Earth."

　　What do you think of the view of education expressed above? Explain, using reasons and/or specific examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　This view seems to recommend that schools stress the unity of all people instead of their diversity. While I agree that education should include leaching students about characteristics that we all share, doing so need not necessarily entail shifting focus away from our differences. Education can and should include both.

　　On the one hand, we are in the midst of an evolving global community where it is increasingly important for people to recognize our common humanity, as well as specific hopes and goals we all share. People universally prer health to disease, being nourished to starving, safe communities to crime-riddled ones, and peace to war. Focusing on our unity will help us realize these hopes and goals. Moreover, in ear pluralistic democracy it is crucial to find ways to unify citizens from diverse backgrounds. Otherwise, we risk being reduced to ethnic, religious or political factions at war with one another, as witnessed recently in the former Yugoslavia. Our own diverse society can forestall such horrors only if citizens are educated about the democratic ideals, heritage, rights and obligations we all have in common.

　　On the other hand, our schools should not attempt to erase, ignore, or even play down religious, ethnic or cultural diversity. First of all, schools have the obligation to teach the democratic ideal of tolerance. And the best way to teach tolerance is to educate people about different religions, cultures and so on. Moreover, educating people about diversity might even produce a unifying fect-by promoting understanding and appreciation among people from all backgrounds.

　　In conclusion, while it may appear paradoxical to recommend that education stress both unity and diversity, it is not- Understanding our common humanity will help us achieve a better, more peacul world. Toward the same end, we need to understand our differences in order to better tolerate them, and perhaps even appreciate them. Our schools can and should promote both kinds of understanding by way of a balanced approach.

　　People often give the following advice: "Be yourself. Follow your instincts and behave in a way that feels natural."

　　Do you think that, in general, this is good advice? Why or why not? Develop your point of view by giving reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　The advice to act naturally or follow one&aposs instincts can, admittedly, be helpful advice for someone torn between difficult career or personal choices in life. In most situations, however, following this advice would neither be wise nor sensible. Following one&aposs own instincts should be tempered by codes of behavior appropriate to the situation at hand.

　　&aposFirst of all, doing what comes naturally often amounts to impulsive overreaction and irrational behavior, based on emotion. Everyone experiences impulses from time to time, such as hitting another person, quitting one&aposs job, having an extramarital affair, and so forth. People, who act however they please or say whatever is on their mind without thinking about consequences especially without regard to social situation, may offend and alienate others. At the workplace, engaging in petty gossip, sexual harassment, or backstabbing might be considered "natural," yet such behavior can be destructive for the individuals at the receiving end as well as for the company. And in dealings with foreign business associates, what an American might find natural or instinctive, even if socially acceptable here, might be deeply insulting or confusing to somebody from another culture.

　　Second, doing what comes naturally is not necessarily in one&aposs own best interests. The various behaviors cited above would also tend to be counterproductive for the person engaging in them. "Natural" behavior could prove deadly to one&aposs career, since people who give little thought bore they act cannot be trusted in a job that requires fective relationships with important clients, colleagues and others.

　　Third, the speaker seems to suggest that you should be yourself, and then act accordingly in that order. But we dine ourselves in large measure by our actions. Young adults especially tack a clear sense of self. How can you be yourself if you don&apost know who you are? Even for mature adults, the process of evolving one&aposs concept of self is a perpetual one. In this respect, then, the speaker&aposs recommendation does not make much sense.

　　In sum, one should not follow the speaker&aposs advice universally or too literacy. For unless a person&aposs instincts are to follow standard rules of social and business etiquette, natural behavior can harm others as well as constrain one&aposs own personal and professional growth.

　　"The people we remember best are the ones who broke the rules. "

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　I strongly agree that rule-breakers are the most memorable people. By departing from the status quo, iconoclasts call attention to themselves, some providing conspicuous mirrors for society, others serving j as our primary catalysts for progress.

　　In politics, for example, rule-breakers Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King secured prominent places in history by challenging the status quo through civil disobedience. Renegades such as Ghengu Khan. Stalin, and Hussein, broke all the human rights "rules," thereby leaving indelible marks in f historical record. And future generations will probably remember Nixon and Kennedy more clearly than Carter or Reagan, by way of their rule-breaking activities-specifically, Nixon&aposs Watergate debacle and Kennedy&aposs extra-marital trysts.

　　In the arts, mavericks such as Dali, Picasso, and Warhol, who break established rules of composition, ultimately emerge as the greatest artists, while the names of artists with superior technical skills are relegated to the footnotes of art-history textbooks. Our most influential popular musicians are the flagrant rule breakers-for example, be-bop musicians such as Charlie Parker and Thelonius Monk, who broke all the harmonic rules, and folk musician-poet Bob Dylan, who broke the rules for lyrics.

　　In the sciences, innovation and progress can only result from challenging conventional theories, i.e., by breaking rules. Newton and Einstein, for example, both rused to blindly accept what were perceived at their time as certain "rules" of physics. As a result, both men redined those rules, and both men emerged as two of the most memorable figures in the field of physics.

　　In conclusion, it appears that the deepest positive and negative impressions appear on either side of the same iconoclastic coin. Those who leave the most memorable imprints in history do so by challenging norms, traditions, cherished values, and the general status quo, that is, by breaking the rules.

　　Although "genius" is difficult to dine, one of the qualities of genius is the ability to transcend traditional modes of thought and create new ones.

　　Explain what you think the above statement means and discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this dinition of genius. In your discussion, be sure to include at least one example of someone who, in your opinion, exemplifies genius or a particular characteristic of genius.

　　I strongly agree that true genius is the ability to see beyond conventional modes of thinking and to suggest new and better ones. This dinition property sets genius apart from lesser instances of critical acumen, inventiveness or creativity. Under this dinition, a true genius must successfully (I) challenge the assumptions underlying a current paradigm, and (2) supplant the old paradigm with a new, better, and more fruitful one.

　　This two-pronged standard for true genius is aptly illustrated by examining the scientific contribution of the century astronomer Copernicus. Prior to Copernicus, our view of the universe was governed by the Ptolemaic paradigm of a geocentric universe, according to which our earth was in a fixed position I at the center of the universe, with other heavenly bodies revolving around it. Copernicus challenged | this paradigm and its key assumptions by introducing a distinction between real motion and motion that s merely apparent. In doing so, he satisfied the first requirement of a true genius.

　　|ad Copernicus managed to show only that the old view and its assumptions were problematic, we would not consider him a genius today. Copernicus went on, however, to develop a new paradigm; he &apos claimed that the earth is rotating while hurtling rapidly through space, and that other heavenly bodies only appear to revolve around the earth. Moreover, he reasoned that his view about the earth&aposs real motion could explain the apparent motion of the sun, stars and other planets around the earth. It turned out he was right; and his theories helped facilitate Galileo&aposs empirical observations, Kepler&aposs laws of planetary motion, and Newton&aposs gravitational principle.

　　To sum up, I find the proposed dinition of true genius incisive and accurate; and the example of Copernicus aptly points up the two required elements of true genius required by the dinition.

　　以上我们为大家提供了五篇gmat写作模板，话题是统一与分歧，希望能给大家提供参考。

　　以下我们为大家准备了gmat写作模板，题目是统一与分歧，还是gmat考试比较常出现的话题，gmat写作模板一共五篇，供大家参考。切忌模板不可照搬背诵，看看写作思路而已，仅供参考。

　　"Everywhere, it seems, there are clear and positive signs that people are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences. "

　　In your opinion, how accurate is the view expressed above? Use reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading to develop your position.

　　In determining whether we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences, one must examine overt actions and underlying motives, as well as examining whether our differences are increasing or decreasing. The issue, therore, is quite complex, and the answer is unclear.

　　Disrespect for one another&aposs differences manifests itself in various forms of prejudice and discrimination. Since the civil rights arid feminist movements of the 60s and 70s, it would seem that we have made significant progress toward eliminating racial and sexual discrimination. Antidiscriminatory laws in the areas of employment housing, and education, now protect all significant minority groups-racial minorities and women, the physically challenged and, more recently, homosexuals. Movies and television shows, which for better or worse have become the cynosure of our cultural attention, now tout the rights of minorities, encouraging acceptance of and respect for others.

　　However much of this progress is forced upon us legislatively. Without Title 10 and its progenies, would we voluntarily rrain from the discriminatory behavior that the laws prevent? Perhaps not. Moreover, signs of disrespect are all around us today. Extreme factions still rally around bigoted | demagogues; the number of "hate crimes" is increasing alarmingly; and school-age children seem to ^flaunt a disrespect toward adults as never bore. Finally, what appears to be respect for one another&aposs differences may in fact be an increasing global homogeneity-mat is, we are becoming more and more Hike.

　　In sum, on a societal level it is difficult to distinguish between genuine respect for one another&aposs differences on the one hand and legislated morality and increasing homogeneity on the other. Accordingly, the claim that we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences is somewhat dubious. 上12345下

共5页