GMAT写作如何让“青蛙变王子”.

　　GMAT写作主体部分采用的批判结构是MIT结构，MIT为Mention、Imply和Truth的简写。具体解释来说就是从原文中锁定批判点，对原文判断，如果原公理单薄，就给出其它解释，使自己的表述更充分。今天澳际小编的GMAT写作“青蛙变王子”，就为大家以实例讲解GMAT写作Argument批判结构中的MIT结构是如何实现的。

　　[写作示范]

　　主体：MIT

　　Step 1: Mention

　　原文：

　　One plane’s warning system can receive signals from another’s transponder—a radio set that signals a plane’s course—in order to determine the likelihood of a collision and recommend evasive action.”

　　开头转述：

　　By signaling a plane’s course, this system could forewarn the pilot of possible collision, thereby avoiding airline crash.

　　主体转述：

　　The article describes a warning system capable of receiving signals from another transponder via radio and thus able to determine the course of plane.

　　Step 2: Imply

　　This deion might have been attempting to mislead us into believing that not knowing about the course is the main reason for former collisions, and that there is no other ways to know about the routes of aircrafts.

　　Step 3: Truth (common sense, alternative explanations, and counterexamples)

　　But common sense informs us that the reasons of a collision might be attributed to many other factors from both within and without, and that air traffic control has more fective measures like GPS to coordinate navigation.

　　If the former collisions were mostly resulting from the fatigue of pilots or from the malfunction in some part of the plane, then these collisions would not be avoided even if we had installed such warning system that can only signal the course of a plane.

　　Step 4: MIT

　　The article describes a warning system capable of receiving signals from another transponder via radio and thus able to determine the course of plane. This deion might have been attempting to mislead us into believing that not knowing about the course is the main reason for former collisions, and that there is no other ways to know about the routes of aircrafts. But common sense informs us that the reasons of a collision might be attributed to many other factors from both within and without, and that air traffic control has more fective measures like GPS to coordinate navigation. So if the former collisions were mostly resulting from the fatigue of pilots or from the malfunction in some part of the plane, then these collisions would not be avoided even if we had installed such warning system that can only signal the course of a plane.

　　(146 words)

　　TIM

　　Common sense informs us that the reasons of a collision might be attributed to many other factors from both within and without, and that air traffic control has more fective measures like GPS to coordinate navigation. So if the former collisions were mostly resulting from the fatigue of pilots or from the malfunction in some part of the plane, then these collisions would not be avoided even if we had installed such warning system that can only signal the course of a plane. But the speaker might have been attempting to mislead us into believing that not knowing about the course is the main reason for former collisions, and that there is no other ways to know about the routes of aircrafts. To bolster this beli, the article describes a warning system capable of receiving signals from another transponder via radio and thus able to determine the course of plane. Unfortunately, this deion could merely serve to strengthen one possibility but has failed to rule out other possibilities mentioned above.

　　(170 words)

　　通过以上的介绍相信大家对GMAT写作的MIT结构有了一定的认识，大家可以沿用澳际小编推荐的方法来试写一篇文章。希望GMAT写作“青蛙变王子”能够对大家的GMAT写作有帮助。