GMAT写作七宗罪.

　　对于GMAT写作来说，并不是有模板就是万能的。GMAT写作模板也是有题材和内容限定的，不能在考场上盲目乱用。今天小编为大家精心整理了GMAT写作模板的错误使用的相关内容，供大家参考。来看GMAT写作七宗罪是什么，希望对大家有所帮助!

　　GMAT写作模板的乱用使之有七宗罪

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之一：无因果联系

　　The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred bore B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之二：Insufficient-sample

　　The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之三：错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向>　　The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之四： all things are equal<纵向>　　The author commits the fallacy of "all things are equal". The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之五： Either-Or choice

　　The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之六： survey is doubtful

　　The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

　　GMAT写作七宗罪之七： gratuitous assumption

　　The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.

　　以上就是澳际留学小编为大家总结的2015年GMAT写作模板的错误使用的相关内容，很严肃的提出了GMAT写作七宗罪作为提醒大家的教训，希望对大家有所帮助，最后预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得优异的成绩!

　　澳际是国内唯一一家提供海内外求职后续服务的留学咨询公司，并以实力赢得了合作伙伴的信赖。对于澳际客户，我们将独家提供行前简历制作、求职信书写、模拟面试、职场生存、建立人际网等的指导;“后留学”时期，海外凭借澳际美国猎头合作伙伴和与世界500强企业人力资源部的良好合作关系，更能为优秀的留学生提供丰富的实习、工作机会。