过来人为你阐释GMAT写作七宗罪.

　　很多考生在备考GMAT写作的时候都会听人提起GMAT写作七宗罪，听起来这么严肃，有没有吓到大家呢?那么大家知道GMAT写作七宗罪是什么吗?今天澳际留学小编为大家介绍的是GMAT写作七宗罪的主要内容，和小编一起了解一下，自己不要犯哦!

　　GMAT写作七宗罪是什么：

　　第一宗罪：无因果联系

　　The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred bore B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality. However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.

　　第二宗罪 样本不足

　　The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.

　　第三宗罪 错误类比

　　The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

　　第四宗罪 时地全等

　　The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....

　　第五宗罪 二者择一

　　The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.

　　第六宗罪 可疑调查

　　The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

　　第七宗罪 结论无据

　　The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility

　　以上就是澳际留学小编为大家分享的GMAT写作七宗罪，这传说中的GMAT写作七宗罪是什么大家现在了解了吗?如果大家已经读懂，就请在准备GMAT写作的时候不要犯这些错哦!如果大家还想要了解GMAT考试的其他内容，欢迎在线访问澳际教育官网哦!

　　澳际六步曲文书创作与学校申请服务项目根据各项考试成绩和背景提升情况最终确定学校和专业;根据所选学校的要求和特点制定有针对性的申请方案;根据所选学校的要求和特点创作有针对性的申请文书;指导申请人完成Writing Sample/Research Proposal 和Portfolio 的制作;指导申请人办理成绩单、在读证明、毕业证明，存款证明等相关申请材料;指导申请人完成网上申请和邮寄申请材料。