悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业,现居澳洲,在澳学习生活15+年,从事教育咨询工作超过10年,澳洲政府注册教育顾问,上千成功升学转学签证案例,定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
您所在的位置: 首页> 新闻列表> GMAT语法知识点:So as to与 to的区别.
GMAT语法知识点相对而言比较散,这就需要考生朋友学会总结,而由于时间问题或者经验,考生朋友都没有太多的时间去进行收集整理,为此澳际小编特进行收集整理,今天我们主要说的是enough的固定搭配这一GMAT语法知识点,希望对大家的复习有所帮助,仅供参考。
So as to跟to并不是完全对等的!so as to里面有as这个连词,隔开前后,前面的统统是过程,后面统统是目的,而to没有连词,如果to do做状语,修饰的是最近谓语动
参考例题澳际小编
738. The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculptured portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an “artificial face.”
· so unrealistic as to constitute
· so unrealistic they constituted
· so unrealistic that they have constituted
· unrealistic enough so that they constitute
· unrealistic enough so as to constitute
Key: A
OG的解释:澳际小编
The verbs are and calls indicate that the sculpture is being viewed and judged in the present. Thus, neither the past tense verb constituted (in B) nor the present perfect verb have constituted (in C) is correct; both suggest that the statue’s features once constituted an artificial face but no longer do so. Also, B would be better if that were inserted after so unrealistic, although the omission of that is not ungrammatical. Choices D and E use unidiomatic constructions with enough: unrealistic enough to constitute would be idiomatic, but the use of enough is imprecise and awkward in this context. Choice A, which uses the clear, concise, and idiomatic construction so unrealistic as to constitute, is best.澳际编辑转载注明
以上就是对于enough的固定搭配这一GMAT语法知识点的相关介绍,考生朋友不妨在遇到此类题型时对于文中的一些用法进行试验,最后祝大家都能考出好成绩。
Amy GUO 经验: 16年 案例:4272 擅长:美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站(www.aoji.cn,刊载的所有内容,访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏,以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途,但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定,不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外,将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时,须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可,并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容,请及时通知本站,予以删除。