1鸟和蝙蝠吃昆虫

考古 已确认

蝙蝠和鸟的捕食能力

V1

一个实验做了, 特别强调了实验的时间是某年的7月, 分了四个区, 一个不让蝙蝠进, 一个不让鸟进, 一个蝙蝠和鸟都可以进, 还一个什么来着, 结果发现那些让蝙蝠进的区域昆虫数量都显着下降了, 得出结论说蝙蝠对控制昆虫种群密度更有效, 问weaken;

我选了说蝙蝠在夏天捕食能力特别高 ---- 这个好象是strengthen

好象下面提到的，说蝙蝠夏天的繁殖能力很强，这个倒是说明了单只蝙蝠的作用并不更大，所以weaken

V2

补充一下：还有一个是蝙蝠和鸟都能进；我记得我选的选项说的是蝙蝠的reproduce能力在夏天特别强（题目中在括号里说这个实验是2007年6月到7月做的）

其实CR误导性更强，但我觉得题都挺好玩儿的，就发上来了，希望大家批判着看~

2机场运客轨道往东还是往西修

考古：已确认

解决拥堵问题

V1一城市修建通往机场的rail，以缓解交通堵塞。有两个机场 W and E，但是rail只能缓解一个。因为60%的乘客去E 所以要rail通往E，问evaluate

我选的答案是 per fly的乘客数对比。我觉得是虽然E的总的多，但不一定乘客会聚在一起。交通堵塞也许不严重

V2因为去机场的路堵塞，政府考虑修新的地铁还是什么的，这个城市有2个机场，west and south, 政府只能修建其中一个路线。West 登机乘客占60%，所以建议修west的。问需要知道什么？

我选的是A需要知道两个机场乘客中只是转机的乘客的比例

3 fish and settlers

V1

曾经great lake鱼很多时周围住的settlers很多，鱼少了住在湖边的人就少了。问flaw，我选是错的，我觉得湖被污染了是正确答案 但是一犹豫选了别的。。。

考古：

V1狗主人说：题目有点相似，但我不记得有打猎那个选项。。。

某个种族靠打鱼为生，所以应该只住在渔产丰富的河的沿岸，可是发现有些人也住在现在渔产不怎么丰富的河边，说明鱼的分布后来变了。问weaken。有个选项是他们也打猎。

4 卡车GWD变体

V1

卡车变形体： A：3节卡车太危险，所以应该禁止在高速上开，所以有3各州都禁止 B：在这三个州中三节卡车事故低于普通的卡车，所以不应该禁止 问B的错 我选的是限制不等于禁止，现在想想太不靠谱了

V2

卡车变形体： A：triple-trailers3节卡车太危险，又重又不好制动什么的,总之就是很危险,所以应该禁止在高速上开，3个州都禁止 卡车的维护者：在这三个州中三节卡车事故低于(not greater than)普通的卡车，中间有一句挺关键的没看懂,所以不应该禁止 问B的错 我好像选的"not greater than"不等于少于......

V3

三節卡車的變形題，某人提到了三節卡車常常有亂調頭行駛等違規行為，所以應該"禁止它們上高速公路"。

然後卡車公司的人出來護航說，三節卡車車禍比率比普通車低什麼的，然後說它們不應該被"禁止行駛"。

然後提目問卡車公司的人那段話有什麼功用。這題不難，

我選的是E吧，說他答非所問之類的意思。

考古 狗主人说：内容有相似，但问法绝对不一样，大家注意变体

GWD-28-Q17

In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently account for 6 percent of miles driven on Partoria’s roads but are involved in 12 percent of all highway fatalities. The very largest trucks – those with three trailers – had less than a third of the accident rate of single- and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therore, one way for Partoria to reduce highway deaths would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A): Partorian trucking companies have so far used triple-trailer trucks on lightly traveled sections of major highways only.

B): No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.

C): Very few fatal collisions involving trucks in Partoria are collisions between two trucks.

D): In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.

E): In Partoria, the maximum legal payload of a triple-trailer truck is less than three times the maximum legal payload of the largest of the single-trailer trucks

answer: A

3. Opponents of allowing triple-trailer trucks to use the national highway system are wrong in claiming that these trucks are more dangerous than other commercial vehicles. In the western part of the country, in areas where triple-trailers are now permitted on some highways, for these vehicles the rate of road accident fatalities per mile of travel is lower than the national rate for other types of commercial vehicles. Clearly, triple-trailers are safer than other commercial vehicles.

Which one of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument? OA：B

(A) It takes two smaller semitrailers to haul as much weight as a single triple-trailer can.

(B) Highways in the sparsely populated West are much less heavily traveled and consequently are far safer than highways in the national system as a whole.

(C) Opponents of the triple-trailers also once opposed the shorter twin-trailers, which are now common on the nation’s highways.

(D) In areas where the triple-trailers are permitted, drivers need a special license to operate them.

(E) For triple-trailers the rate of road accident fatalities per mile of travel was higher last year than in the two previous years.

Prep CR1 90

90.

In the nation of Partoria, large trucks currently have a much higher rate of traffic accidents per mile driven than other vehicles do. However, the very largest trucks—those with three trailers—had less than a third of the accident rate of single- and double-trailer trucks. Clearly, therore, one way for Partoria to reduce the number of traffic accidents would be to require shippers to increase their use of triple-trailer trucks.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Partorian trucking companies currently use triple-trailer trucks only for long trips using major highways, which is the safest kind of trip for large trucks.

B. No matter what changes Partoria makes in the regulation of trucking, it will have to keep some smaller roads off-limits to all large trucks.

C. Increased use of triple-trailer trucks would mean that large trucks would account for a smaller proportion of all miles driven on Partoria’s roads than they currently do.

D. In Partoria, the safety record of the trucking industry as a whole has improved slightly over the past ten years.

E. The volume of truck traffic on Partoria’s highways could be reduced by encouraging shippers to use rail transport whenever possible.

5 引狼入园

V1

说一个公园引入狼,他们喜欢吃A,而A是以B为食的..

THUS,引入狼这个手段可以提高B的数量.. 问加强 我选的是现象..A确实下降了..其他的似乎都是削弱..

1鸟和蝙蝠吃昆虫

考古 已确认

蝙蝠和鸟的捕食能力

V1

一个实验做了, 特别强调了实验的时间是某年的7月, 分了四个区, 一个不让蝙蝠进, 一个不让鸟进, 一个蝙蝠和鸟都可以进, 还一个什么来着, 结果发现那些让蝙蝠进的区域昆虫数量都显着下降了, 得出结论说蝙蝠对控制昆虫种群密度更有效, 问weaken;

我选了说蝙蝠在夏天捕食能力特别高 ---- 这个好象是strengthen

好象下面提到的，说蝙蝠夏天的繁殖能力很强，这个倒是说明了单只蝙蝠的作用并不更大，所以weaken

V2

补充一下：还有一个是蝙蝠和鸟都能进；我记得我选的选项说的是蝙蝠的reproduce能力在夏天特别强（题目中在括号里说这个实验是2007年6月到7月做的）

其实CR误导性更强，但我觉得题都挺好玩儿的，就发上来了，希望大家批判着看~

2机场运客轨道往东还是往西修

考古：已确认

解决拥堵问题

V1一城市修建通往机场的rail，以缓解交通堵塞。有两个机场 W and E，但是rail只能缓解一个。因为60%的乘客去E 所以要rail通往E，问evaluate

我选的答案是 per fly的乘客数对比。我觉得是虽然E的总的多，但不一定乘客会聚在一起。交通堵塞也许不严重

V2因为去机场的路堵塞，政府考虑修新的地铁还是什么的，这个城市有2个机场，west and south, 政府只能修建其中一个路线。West 登机乘客占60%，所以建议修west的。问需要知道什么？

我选的是A需要知道两个机场乘客中只是转机的乘客的比例

3 fish and settlers

V1

曾经great lake鱼很多时周围住的settlers很多，鱼少了住在湖边的人就少了。问flaw，我选是错的，我觉得湖被污染了是正确答案 但是一犹豫选了别的。。。

考古：

V1狗主人说：题目有点相似，但我不记得有打猎那个选项。。。

某个种族靠打鱼为生，所以应该只住在渔产丰富的河的沿岸，可是发现有些人也住在现在渔产不怎么丰富的河边，说明鱼的分布后来变了。问weaken。有个选项是他们也打猎。

4 卡车GWD变体

V1

卡车变形体： A：3节卡车太危险，所以应该禁止在高速上开，所以有3各州都禁止 B：在这三个州中三节卡车事故低于普通的卡车，所以不应该禁止 问B的错 我选的是限制不等于禁止，现在想想太不靠谱了

V2

卡车变形体： A：triple-trailers3节卡车太危险，又重又不好制动什么的,总之就是很危险,所以应该禁止在高速上开，3个州都禁止 卡车的维护者：在这三个州中三节卡车事故低于(not greater than)普通的卡车，中间有一句挺关键的没看懂,所以不应该禁止 问B的错 我好像选的"not greater than"不等于少于......

上12下

共2页