澳际学费在线支付平台
悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业，现居澳洲，在澳学习生活15+年，从事教育咨询工作超过10年，澳洲政府注册教育顾问，上千成功升学转学签证案例，定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
澳际留学为大家整理2011年GMAT机经，方便大家复习备考。以下是2011年3月GMAT作文机经，AI篇，自2011年2月25日起至2011年3月15日，共36题。前1-32题详见 GMAT机经,2011年2-3月GMAT作文机经AI(至3.8)(一) 至 (八) ，以下是33-36题。澳际留学祝同学们考试顺利!
35. citizens should be required to do public service， because it will benit the society as a whole and each individual. 这题让我很没头绪，乱写的，实在举不出例子。
“All citizens should be required to perform a specified amount of public service. Such service would benit not only the country as a whole but also the individual participants.”
The potential benits of mandatory public service must be weighed against administrative problems and concerns about individual liberty. On balance, the costs to a nation and to the participants would probably exceed the benits.
Admittedly, a colorable argument can be made for mandatory public service. It would help alleviate “free-rider” problems, where those who do not contribute benit from the forts of those who do. It would mitigate pressing social problems—with education, public health and safety, and the environment. It might instill in participants a sense of civic duty, community, and individual responsibility. Finally, it has worked on a smaller scale, particularly in urban areas, where renewal projects succeed in making communities safer, healthier, and more prosperous.
Far more compelling, however, are the arguments against mandatory public service. First, who would make assignments and decide what projects are worthwhile, and how would compliance be assured? Resolving enforcement issues would require government control, in turn requiring increased taxes and/or cuts in other social programs, thereby nullifying the benits of mandatory public service. Second, a mandatory system would open the floodgates to incompetence and inexperience. Finally, the whole notion seems tantamount to Communism insofar as each citizen must contribute, according to his or her ability, to a strong state. Modern history informs us that such systems do not work. One could argue that mandatory public service is simply a tax in the form of labor rather than dollars. However, compulsory labor smacks of involuntary servitude, whereas financial taxes do not.
In conclusion, logistical and philosophical barriers to mandating public service outweigh its potential benits for the nation as well as for participants.
36.这题jj上没有，To protect national security, the government should keep any information as they wish。
以上澳际留学为大家独家整理2011年GMAT机经，以上2011年3月GMAT作文机经AI篇，自2011年2月25日起至2011年3月15日，共36题。前1-32题详见 GMAT机经,2011年2-3月GMAT作文机经AI(至3.8)(一) 至 (八) 澳际留学祝同学们考试顺利!
以上GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
GMAT机经,2011年3月GMAT作文机经AI(至3.15)(三)GMAT作文机经以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
澳际留学为大家整理2011年GMAT机经，方便大家复习备考。以下是2011年3月GMAT作文机经，AI篇，自2011年2月25日起至2011年3月15日，共36题。前1-32题详见 GMAT机经,2011年2-3月GMAT作文机经AI(至3.8)(一) 至 (八) ，以下是33-36题。澳际留学祝同学们考试顺利!
35. citizens should be required to do public service， because it will benit the society as a whole and each individual. 这题让我很没头绪，乱写的，实在举不出例子。
“All citizens should be required to perform a specified amount of public service. Such service would benit not only the country as a whole but also the individual participants.”
The potential benits of mandatory public service must be weighed against administrative problems and concerns about individual liberty. On balance, the costs to a nation and to the participants would probably exceed the benits.
Admittedly, a colorable argument can be made for mandatory public service. It would help alleviate “free-rider” problems, where those who do not contribute benit from the forts of those who do. It would mitigate pressing social problems—with education, public health and safety, and the environment. It might instill in participants a sense of civic duty, community, and individual responsibility. Finally, it has worked on a smaller scale, particularly in urban areas, where renewal projects succeed in making communities safer, healthier, and more prosperous. 上12下
共2页
阅读全文Amy GUO 经验： 16年 案例：4272 擅长：美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站（www.aoji.cn，刊载的所有内容，访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏，以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途，但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定，不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外，将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时，须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可，并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
