澳际学费在线支付平台
悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业，现居澳洲，在澳学习生活15+年，从事教育咨询工作超过10年，澳洲政府注册教育顾问，上千成功升学转学签证案例，定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
以下澳际留学为大家独家整理2011年GMAT机经，以下详细2011年3月及4月GMAT作文机经汇总，AI41篇，自2011年3月27日至2011年4月16日。祝大家考试顺利！
24、5次Governments should not be responsible for regulating businesses and other organizations. Instead, society would benit if the organizations themselves assumed most of the responsibility for establishing and enforcing their own standards and regulations. (132 or 131)
提供观点：
1. Admittedly, the government should not regulate the business or other organizations too much. Too much supervision will harm the development of the business or an organization.
2. Let the business alone to regulate itself will also cause problems. The ultimate goal of the business is to gain benit, therore all the activities will serve this pivotal goal even at the expense of the social benit.
3. The ideal combination can be the midst.
1. too much interference from the government would undoubtedly impede the development of businesses and organizations. 1, 政府干涉过多可能或扼杀企业的积极性positivity. 显然如果没有自主决定the power of independently making decisions, 那么eventually, lead to the less active economy. 2, 政府过度的exorbitant干涉可能会打乱市场发展的自然规律disturb the natural order of the market. 比如regulation on the type of product 可能市场上的excessive demand or supply.
2. 但是也不是说政府should assume no necessary supervision over the business. 首先, 毕竟,企业的一切行为都是为了利益最大化. 缺乏管理,很可能产生很多negative results.政府有义务确保keep the national market in healthy condition. 如果缺乏suitable regulation, 有可能会出现恶性的竞争inordinate competition. 又比如Enron cheat on the financial condition. 第二, 政府有时要帮助企业度过recession.依靠企业自身的力量, 可能不能overcome the huge destroy of the recession.
要有适当的regulation, 同时adequate freedom. 才能健康地发展.
提供观点：
1. For groups and organizations that are stable, it is reasonable to have a flat organizational structure.
2. For groups and organizations that are always confronted with emergencies, it is always better to give one certain person central authority and responsibility.
3. It is hard to say that one structure is necessarily better than the other. They all have advantages and disadvantages. And it is a case-by-case discussion.
1， Admittedly, 在团队中，每个人都应该起到积极的作用take positive action。责任和义务的share可以激发每个人更加主动motivate the members’ creativity and initiative. 比方说，many companies let the employees to buy shares and stocks.
2， 但是，这样不是说，everyone should be given the power to make the final decision. 首先，天性是自私的。In many circumstances, the personal goal may be different from or even contrary to the goal of the group. 如果任由每个人作出决定，很可能作出相反的，产生很多矛盾。incompatible conflict. 比如企业中，每个员工都想争取最多的工资，但也许与企业cost-cutting policy想矛盾。
这时候，就需要one person with the authority and responsibility for a project来协调assort with the different interests。synthesize the various voices of all the group members and make the final decision.这样才能有效地领导一个团队，不会偏离最初的目标stray from the initial goal of the task.以上澳际留学为大家整理2011年GMAT机经，以上2011年3月及4月GMAT作文机经，2011年3月27日至2011年4月16日，AI共41篇。祝大家考试顺利！
以上GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
GMAT机经,2011年GMAT作文机经AI(至4.16)(十二)GMAT机经,2011年GMAT作文机经AI(至4.16)(十二)以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!
以下澳际留学为大家独家整理2011年GMAT机经，以下详细2011年3月及4月GMAT作文机经汇总，AI41篇，自2011年3月27日至2011年4月16日。祝大家考试顺利！
24、5次Governments should not be responsible for regulating businesses and other organizations. Instead, society would benit if the organizations themselves assumed most of the responsibility for establishing and enforcing their own standards and regulations. (132 or 131)
提供观点：
1. Admittedly, the government should not regulate the business or other organizations too much. Too much supervision will harm the development of the business or an organization.
2. Let the business alone to regulate itself will also cause problems. The ultimate goal of the business is to gain benit, therore all the activities will serve this pivotal goal even at the expense of the social benit.
3. The ideal combination can be the midst.
1. too much interference from the government would undoubtedly impede the development of businesses and organizations. 1, 政府干涉过多可能或扼杀企业的积极性positivity. 显然如果没有自主决定the power of independently making decisions, 那么eventually, lead to the less active economy. 2, 政府过度的exorbitant干涉可能会打乱市场发展的自然规律disturb the natural order of the market. 比如regulation on the type of product 可能市场上的excessive demand or supply.
2. 但是也不是说政府should assume no necessary supervision over the business. 首先, 毕竟,企业的一切行为都是为了利益最大化. 缺乏管理,很可能产生很多negative results.政府有义务确保keep the national market in healthy condition. 如果缺乏suitable regulation, 有可能会出现恶性的竞争inordinate competition. 又比如Enron cheat on the financial condition. 第二, 政府有时要帮助企业度过recession.依靠企业自身的力量, 可能不能overcome the huge destroy of the recession.
要有适当的regulation, 同时adequate freedom. 才能健康地发展. 上12下
共2页
阅读全文Amy GUO 经验： 16年 案例：4272 擅长：美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站（www.aoji.cn，刊载的所有内容，访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏，以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途，但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定，不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外，将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时，须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可，并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
