澳际学费在线支付平台
悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业，现居澳洲，在澳学习生活15+年，从事教育咨询工作超过10年，澳洲政府注册教育顾问，上千成功升学转学签证案例，定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
以下澳际留学更新2011gmat机经，以下2011年7月-8月gmat作文机经更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!
24. 说一个firm 如果增加information technology 的投入的话 公司就会profitable
内容来源于一家广告公司的高科技部门：有结论说员工的效率越高，公司的profit就越高。又有结论说对经常使用电脑的部门进行高科技方面的投资，这些部门的员工的工作效率就越高。于是该部门说他们计划投资目前available的最尖端的科技，这样公司的profit per dollar就会随着员工效率(貌似是这个词)而升高。
题库原题：
The more ficient a firm&aposs employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm&aposs information technology hardware and software are a proven way to increase the ficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therore, if our firm invests in the most powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm&aposs profit margins.
“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices (n. 外地办事处) and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc
下面摘自APogee公司的商务部门的备忘录： 当Apogee将它所有的业务部门集中在一处时，它将有比现在更多的利润。因此，Apogee应该关闭它的驻外办公室并从单一场所管理它的所有部门。这样的话，集中会通过削减成本提高利润，并帮助公司更好地对所有员工进行监督。
北美范文
In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.
First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.
Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line (帐本底线) such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, infective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wastul spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event (decreasing profits) follows another (decentralization), the second event has been caused by the first.
In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.
思路提供
1. causal oversimplification: It is imprudent to conclude that the establishment of the field offices is the only reason explaining the decline of the profit.
2. all things are equal: The success of the centralization of the past does not guarantee the applicability in the future.
3. either-or-or choice: The author assumes that the centralization and the establishment of field offices are mutually exclusive alternatives, there is no middle ground between they two. In fact, we can have the field offices under centralized control.
以上澳际留学更新2011年gmat机经，以上2011年7月-8月gmat作文机经更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!
gmat机经,7-8月gmat作文机经AA(至7.31)(十四)gmat机经,7-8月gmat作文机经AA(至7.31)(十四)gmat机经,7-8月gmat作文机经AA(至7.31)(十四)gmat机经,7-8月gmat作文机经AA(至7.31)(十四)以下澳际留学更新2011gmat机经，以下2011年7月-8月gmat作文机经更新，AA，7月28日至7月30日，共26题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!
24. 说一个firm 如果增加information technology 的投入的话 公司就会profitable
内容来源于一家广告公司的高科技部门：有结论说员工的效率越高，公司的profit就越高。又有结论说对经常使用电脑的部门进行高科技方面的投资，这些部门的员工的工作效率就越高。于是该部门说他们计划投资目前available的最尖端的科技，这样公司的profit per dollar就会随着员工效率(貌似是这个词)而升高。
题库原题：
The more ficient a firm&aposs employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm&aposs information technology hardware and software are a proven way to increase the ficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therore, if our firm invests in the most powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm&aposs profit margins. 上1234下
共4页
阅读全文Amy GUO 经验： 16年 案例：4272 擅长：美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站（www.aoji.cn，刊载的所有内容，访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏，以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途，但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定，不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外，将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时，须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可，并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
