gmat机经10-11月gmat作文机经AA(至11.2)(六).

　　以下澳际留学更新2011gmat机经，以下2011年10-11月gmat作文机经更新，AA，10月27至11月2日，共31题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!

　　17. 3次

　　卖冰淇淋不赚钱

　　原题：No.106 “We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot — the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cow’s net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter.”

　　思路：

　　 排除他因，净收入下降的原因是什么?可能是经营不好，草率定价，甚至正因为缺乏竞争导致了这些。

　　 寒冷冬天不等于没有夏天，也不等于夏天短暂。不能说明原因。

　　 Other factors in deciding whether to give loan to a company such as the credit of the company should be considered.

　　 Admittedly, the former and prospective performance of the company is also important when the bank have to make decision of whether or not should it give loan to a company. However, the author of the memorandum show no sufficient evidence to support his or her proposal that the bank should not give loan to Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors.

　　 The statistics last year does not necessarily denote the future trend.

　　范文：

　　In this memorandum the loan department of Frostbite National Bank recommends against approval of a business loan to a local group that wants to open an ice creamparlor. In support of this decision the loan department points out that Frostbite has a reputation for cold winters and sales of ice cream decrease in cold weather. This latter point is buttressed by the fact that Frostbite’s only ice cream parlor suffered a 10 percent decline in net revenues the previous winter. The loan department’s decision is questionable for the following reasons.

　　To begin with, since it is reasonable to expect a decline in ice cream sales during winter months, it is difficult to assess the relevance of the fact that Frostbite has cold winters to the potential success of the Kool Kone franchise. Common sense suggests that this fact would be significant only if it turned out that Frostbite’s winter season lasted 9 or 10 months as it does in arctic regions. In that case slow sales could be expected for most of the year and the loan department’s opposition to the loan would be readily understandable. If, on the other hand, Frostbite’s winter season lasts only a few months and the remainder of the year is warm or hot, it is difficult to comprehend the loan department’s reasoning.

　　Next, the loan department assumes that the Frigid Cow’s decline in net revenue last winter was a result of slow sales occasioned by cold weather. While this is a possible reason for the decline, it is not the only factor that could account for it. For example, other factors such as poor business practices or lack of inventory could be responsible for the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue. The loan department’s failure to investigate or even consider these and other possible explanations for the Frigid Cow’s decline in revenue renders their decision highly suspect.

　　In conclusion, the loan department’s decision is ill-founded. To better evaluate the decision, we would need to know more about the length and severity of Frostbite’s winter season. Moreover, evidence would have to be provided to support the assumption that the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue last winter was a direct result of the cold weather.

　　18. 2次

　　采矿公司想转型做再生能源企业 把人才分配到风力 火力 blah blah 觉得那样会成功

　　Due to the decline demand of the mining technology, all the related corporations are suffering form decline of profit and sales this year, including Blastcom Corporation. Blastcom Corporation is considering adopting one growth strategy: to shift some of the researchers from mining technology to the renewable energy technology, the demand for the renewable energy such as solar energy. Some of the prominent companies which market the renewable energy are successful in recent years. Therore, it is guaranteed that company Blastcom will also be successful in the future by providing renewable energy

　　考古：

　　V1一个Blastom公司，以前是mining technology，由于mining technology的市场变小，为保证股价和利润，B公司有新战略：让以前研究mining的科学家研究renewable energy，一些公司已经在新能源领域做得很成功啦，所以B公司转向新能源领域能保证股价和利润

　　V2好像是“能源产品的价格和股票走低，使得一些公司不能盈利，include B company.然而有一些renewable energy company非常好。B company决定一个策略：将自己公司的researcher去转向新能源，比如风能，太阳能。这样就可以一直保持盈利

　　V3说专攻mining 技术的一个M公司开始把他们家的专家staff转向研究新能源例如天然气之类的。因为绝大多数的新能源公司在过去几年都很成功。所以这个M公司觉着他们也能保证盈利

　　V4 mining techchnology will adopt a new renewable energy....

　　V5Due to woldwide derease in demand for mining technology, 某公司profit and stock prices went down. 但是有一些prominent companies in renewable technologies发展的很好。因此该公司应该把research的力量全部投入到renewable technologies去，这样就能stay safe from any future decline.

　　V6去年矿产业效益不好，利润下降，一个技术公司为了 扭转局面，放弃研究矿产技术开发转而投资研究新能源开发 比如太阳能 风能还有生物能源，取得了良好的效益。 根据这件事写个评价之类的东西，让你讨论在什么情况下，是weaken这个结论的。

（未完见下一页）

　　19. 2次

　　人们有个误解,认为大学医院比社区(cummunity)医院和私人医院好，事实上大学医院与私人医院比：医生少20%、治疗成功率低、给员工的钱少等等等等... Furthermore，大学医院的医生把时间花在了研究、治疗和xxx上。因此大学医院的质量比所有其他形式的医院质量低。”

　　原题: No.43 The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.

　　“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”

　　有一种普遍的错误观念认为大学医院比社区或私人医院更好。这个想法是无根据的，我们地区的大学医院较之私人医院，少雇15%的医生，对患者的治愈率要低20%，总体利润要小得多，给一户员工的待遇比私人医院低很多。而且，很多大学医院的医生将他们的时间分为教学，直到研究和看病几部分。从此可明显看出大学医院的服务质量比其他医院低。

　　思路：

　　 从一个医院的情况就推广到整个太草率

　　 治愈率低可能是因为接受的患者得的病都比较罕见等原因造成的

　　 工资低，总体利润低，时间分配给教学都不能一定说明质量差。可能其他福利好，接受的病人少，教学研究有助于进步

　　范文：

　　In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

　　The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.

　　Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.

　　Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.

　　以上澳际留学更新2011年gmat机经，以上2011年10-11月gmat作文机经更新，AA，10月27至11月2日，共31题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!

　　以下澳际留学更新2011gmat机经，以下2011年10-11月gmat作文机经更新，AA，10月27至11月2日，共31题。希望大家的gmat考试顺利!

　　17. 3次

　　卖冰淇淋不赚钱

　　原题：No.106 “We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot — the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cow’s net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter.”

　　思路：

　　 排除他因，净收入下降的原因是什么?可能是经营不好，草率定价，甚至正因为缺乏竞争导致了这些。

　　 寒冷冬天不等于没有夏天，也不等于夏天短暂。不能说明原因。

　　 Other factors in deciding whether to give loan to a company such as the credit of the company should be considered.

　　 Admittedly, the former and prospective performance of the company is also important when the bank have to make decision of whether or not should it give loan to a company. However, the author of the memorandum show no sufficient evidence to support his or her proposal that the bank should not give loan to Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors.

　　 The statistics last year does not necessarily denote the future trend.

　　范文：

　　In this memorandum the loan department of Frostbite National Bank recommends against approval of a business loan to a local group that wants to open an ice creamparlor. In support of this decision the loan department points out that Frostbite has a reputation for cold winters and sales of ice cream decrease in cold weather. This latter point is buttressed by the fact that Frostbite’s only ice cream parlor suffered a 10 percent decline in net revenues the previous winter. The loan department’s decision is questionable for the following reasons.

　　To begin with, since it is reasonable to expect a decline in ice cream sales during winter months, it is difficult to assess the relevance of the fact that Frostbite has cold winters to the potential success of the Kool Kone franchise. Common sense suggests that this fact would be significant only if it turned out that Frostbite’s winter season lasted 9 or 10 months as it does in arctic regions. In that case slow sales could be expected for most of the year and the loan department’s opposition to the loan would be readily understandable. If, on the other hand, Frostbite’s winter season lasts only a few months and the remainder of the year is warm or hot, it is difficult to comprehend the loan department’s reasoning.

　　Next, the loan department assumes that the Frigid Cow’s decline in net revenue last winter was a result of slow sales occasioned by cold weather. While this is a possible reason for the decline, it is not the only factor that could account for it. For example, other factors such as poor business practices or lack of inventory could be responsible for the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue. The loan department’s failure to investigate or even consider these and other possible explanations for the Frigid Cow’s decline in revenue renders their decision highly suspect.

　　In conclusion, the loan department’s decision is ill-founded. To better evaluate the decision, we would need to know more about the length and severity of Frostbite’s winter season. Moreover, evidence would have to be provided to support the assumption that the Frigid Cow’s loss of revenue last winter was a direct result of the cold weather.

　　18. 2次

　　采矿公司想转型做再生能源企业 把人才分配到风力 火力 blah blah 觉得那样会成功

　　Due to the decline demand of the mining technology, all the related corporations are suffering form decline of profit and sales this year, including Blastcom Corporation. Blastcom Corporation is considering adopting one growth strategy: to shift some of the researchers from mining technology to the renewable energy technology, the demand for the renewable energy such as solar energy. Some of the prominent companies which market the renewable energy are successful in recent years. Therore, it is guaranteed that company Blastcom will also be successful in the future by providing renewable energy

　　考古：

　　V1一个Blastom公司，以前是mining technology，由于mining technology的市场变小，为保证股价和利润，B公司有新战略：让以前研究mining的科学家研究renewable energy，一些公司已经在新能源领域做得很成功啦，所以B公司转向新能源领域能保证股价和利润

　　V2好像是“能源产品的价格和股票走低，使得一些公司不能盈利，include B company.然而有一些renewable energy company非常好。B company决定一个策略：将自己公司的researcher去转向新能源，比如风能，太阳能。这样就可以一直保持盈利

　　V3说专攻mining 技术的一个M公司开始把他们家的专家staff转向研究新能源例如天然气之类的。因为绝大多数的新能源公司在过去几年都很成功。所以这个M公司觉着他们也能保证盈利

　　V4 mining techchnology will adopt a new renewable energy....

　　V5Due to woldwide derease in demand for mining technology, 某公司profit and stock prices went down. 但是有一些prominent companies in renewable technologies发展的很好。因此该公司应该把research的力量全部投入到renewable technologies去，这样就能stay safe from any future decline.

　　V6去年矿产业效益不好，利润下降，一个技术公司为了 扭转局面，放弃研究矿产技术开发转而投资研究新能源开发 比如太阳能 风能还有生物能源，取得了良好的效益。 根据这件事写个评价之类的东西，让你讨论在什么情况下，是weaken这个结论的。

（未完见下一页）

上12下

共2页