GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 4月06日更新（十）.

　　GMAT考试已于2012年4月2日更换题库，以下是2012年4月的GMAT作文AA部分机经更新，更新日期从12年4月2日开始，澳际留学小编会为您送上最新的机经的，希望大家多多关注本频道。在此澳际留学祝大家GMAT考试顺利! 想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入 >>>>有问题?找免费的澳际专家咨询! 或联系QQ客服： ，也可以通过在线咨询处留言，把您最关心的问题告诉我们。

狗主回忆：

　　22. 作者说Univerisity hospital没有私人医院好，因为他们的医生比别人少，治愈的成功率低，医生工资没有私立的高，而且医生经常去做讲座啊神马的，对病人的照顾不够

　　48. A是JJ上一道题，就是那个什么university hospital 的quality of care 不如private hospital好

　　49. AA 说是很多人说university hospital is better than private ones, the conclusion is false.那道

　　原题猜测：

　　The following appeared in an article in the health section of a newspaper.

　　“There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better than community or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: the university hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit, and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals. Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their time among teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seems clear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that at other kinds of hospitals.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned... Etc.

　　思路参考：

　　Insufficient sample：这里将的是“我们地区”，不具有代表性

　　False casual relationship：因为学校医生要上课，做研究，照顾病人，同时工资少，所以说care lower，无因果关系

　　Gratuitous assumption：假设雇佣医生少，付工资就会少没有依据

　　例文：

　　In this argument the author concludes that university hospitals provide no better care than private or community hospitals. The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about university hospitals: the ones in this region employ 15 percent fewer doctors; they have a 20 percent lower success rate in treating patients; they pay their staffs less money; they make less profit than community hospitals; and they utilize doctors who divide their time between teaching, research and treating patients. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

　　The most egregious reasoning error in the argument is the author’s use of evidence pertaining to university hospitals in this region as the basis for a generalization about all university hospitals. The underlying assumption operative in this inference is that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals. No evidence is offered to support this gratuitous assumption.

　　Secondly, the only relevant reason offered in support of the claim that the quality of care is lower in university hospitals than it is at other hospitals is the fact that university hospitals have a lower success rate in treating patients. But this reason is not sufficient to reach the conclusion in question unless it can be shown that the patients treated in both types of hospitals suffered from similar types of maladies. For example, if university hospitals routinely treat patients suffering from rare diseases whereas other hospitals treat only those who suffer from known diseases and illnesses, the difference in success rates would not be indicative of the quality of care received.

　　Finally, the author assumes that the number of doctors a hospital employs, its success rate in treating patients, the amount it pays its staff, and the profits it earns are all reliable indicators of the quality of care it delivers. No evidence is offered to support this assumption nor is it obvious that any of these factors is linked to the quality of care delivered to patients. Moreover, the fact that doctors in university hospitals divide their time among many tasks fails to demonstrate that they do a poorer job of treating patients than doctors at other kinds of hospitals. In fact, it is highly likely that they do a better job because they are more knowledgeable than other doctors due to their teaching and research.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to demonstrate that university hospitals in this region are representative of all university hospitals, as well as establishing a causal link between the various factors cited and the quality of care delivered to patients.

　　以上就是2012年4月06日更新的GMAT作文机经AA部分，考生可以适当借鉴，并通过练习来掌握GMAT作文的解题规律，从而顺利通过GMAT考试。 相关链接：

1.GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 4月06日更新（三）

2.GMAT考试 4月11日更新GMAT语法机经（一）

3.GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 4月06日更新（十一）