GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 5月8日更新（十七）.

GMAT考试已于2012年5月4日更换题库，以下是2012年5月的GMAT作文AA部分机经更新，更新日期从12年5月4日开始，澳际留学小编会为您送上最新的机经的，希望大家多多关注本频道。在此澳际留学祝大家GMAT考试顺利!有一种梦想叫做，常青藤；有一种力量，叫做榜样。你们准备好了吗？现在开始免费领取澳际图书《飞越常青藤》啦！和他们一起飞跃常青藤！

　　28.(2次)

　　原始寂静：

　　V1(BY：Veronica韩 )AA: the Helios city

　　原题：

　　The following appeared aspart of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

　　一份面向地方生活的杂志上的一篇文章 企业在寻找新的商机或位置时应该去Helios城。甚至在最近的衰退中，Helios的失业率也比地区平均水平低，它是地区的工业中心，历史上它提供的比它在地区制造业工作中分享的份额中更多。而且，Helios正试图通过吸引研究和发展革新技术的公司来扩张它的经济基础。

　　参考思路：

　　1.因为H地区industrial and manufacturing比较attractive，所以那里的工人很可能只适合做这类的，如果缺乏能够做innovative technologies and research的工人labor pool，那么很可能导致失败。

　　2.H的低失业率更可能成为坏处。因为比如有less available work force。企业必须提高wage才能吸引他们。提高了COST。

　　3.错误的假设过去的成功能够代表未来。比方说已经饱和的资源、过分的竞争、以及可能出现的错误政策，都可能导致H地区的经济不再发达。

　　七宗罪思路：

　　1.All things are equal(remain unchanged):历史上的作用不能用于仙子啊与未来

　　2.Gratuitous assumption：因为H失业率低于其他地区就假设那里有商机，失业率较低也可能有其他因素导致

　　3.False casual relationship：吸引研究和发展革新技术的公司与商机无直接因果关系

　　参考范文：

　　In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the region’s manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, forts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.

　　To begin with, it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.

　　Another problem with the available work force is its size. Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.

　　In conclusion, the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocate. In fact, the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities to choose Helios.

　　例文2：

　　In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the region’s manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, forts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.

　　To begin with, it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.

　　Another problem with the available work force is its size. Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.

　　In conclusion, the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocate. In fact, the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities to choose Helios.

　　29.(3次)

　　原始寂静：

　　V1(BY: feathsea8 ): 一家jet.. software company 决定要cut budget然后想效仿companies of auto industry把一些permenant employees 换成temporary employees. 因为temporary employees工资低， 享受不到福利什么的。以及，auto industry用这种方法成功地提高了利润，所以software industry肯定用这种方法也可以

　　V2(BY: zhangpuyu1990): 一个公司利润下降了，公司觉得是因为雇了太多的“正式员工”，应该多雇佣临时员工，并且举了auto industry的例子。

　　考古：

　　V1. 某计算机软件开发公司过去三年利润欠佳，看到并揣测汽车产业公司们由于拿临时工替代正式工从而降低成本获得成功，建议自己公司也采取同样办法。

　　V2. 有个软件设计公司，利润三年来都不行了，人家建议学习汽车工业的leading company将员工变成临时工，这样就能有profit的增长了

　　V3. Jetsam Software Design hasn&apost made profits for long time, and it should follow the example of the lead in the auto industry that replaces its expensive, full-time employees with cheaper, temporary employees. 然后说in auto industry how successful such a shift is, so JSD should make the same change for the long-term success and stability of the company.就是最后一句是“ make larger profits in short term and greater stability in long term."

　　参考思路：

　　1.错误的类比：软件业和汽车业

　　2.不一定能带来收入、利益的稳定：可能导致员工积极性下降

　　30.(5次)

　　原始寂静：

　　V1(BY: feathsea8 ): 一个总统的智囊报告说，由于工业污染，国家公园national parks受到了污染，因此导致本国传统支柱产业——旅游业收入下降。同时在国家公园内发现了有矿藏资源，因此智囊建议在公园内开采矿藏以补贴经济。

　　考古：

　　V1. Wemeria这个地方的经济顾问说，Wemeria一直以旅游业为经济基础，但因为increasing industrial pollution某地区的National parks对游客的吸引力没过去好，toruism revenue过去五年持续下降。最近，发现national park里有丰富的mineral资源，政府应该同意mining。因为mining companies将会提高政府的tax revenue;会提供hundreds of jobs for workers previously working in tourism industry.另外，即使without mining, tourism的revenue还是会下降，所以应该批准mining。最后结论说permitting the mining in Wemeria is the best way to revive economy of Wemeria.

　　V2. 某地W，因为工业污染导致当地的national parks less attractive，所以旅游业税收减少。但是呢，在公园底下发现了矿藏，如果被允许开发呢，挖矿公司可以为政府贡献很多税+为那些曾经在旅游业工作的人创造很多工作机会。此外，即使不挖，公园的收入也要是持续减少的，所以挖矿是对该地经济发展的最好选择

　　V3. WERNER的经济主要依靠TOURISM。因为工业污染，国家公园不再像以前那样吸引人，TOURISM的收入在过去五年里持续减少。幸运的是，在国家公园的地下发现了矿脉。如果允许在国家公园里开矿，采矿公司会带来巨大的税收，并且为原来在旅游业工作的人提供上百个岗位。如果不让采矿，国家公园的收入会持续下跌。所以说，允许在国家公园采矿是WERNER 经济的BEST WAY to thrive.

　　七宗罪思路：

　　1. False Casual relationship:游客吸引力和ip无直接因果关系。开发新资源和提高tax,提供更多工作也没有直接因果关系。开发新资源与revive economy 没有直接因果关系，可能因为开发资源National park遭受破坏，游客减少，经济影响更大。

　　2. All things are equal;过去5年下降，不能说明未来都会下降。

　　3. Either or choice:可能会有更好的提振经济的方法

相关链接：

1.GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 5月8日更新（十八）

2.GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 5月7日更新（十五）

3.GMAT作文备考经验小结