GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 5月7日更新（二十）.

　 GMAT考试已于2012年5月4日更换题库，这是旧的GMAT考试最后一次换库了，这也是GMAT作文AI部分的最后一次换库了。新的GMAT考试将于6月份于大家见面，而AI作文将被删除。因此，希望参加最后一次旧GMAT的考生好好努力，争取旗开得胜！以下是2012年5月的GMAT作文AI部分机经更新，更新日期从12年5月7日开始！想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入 >>>>有问题?找免费的澳际专家咨询!

　　33.(6次)

　　原始寂静：

　　V1(BY: memeclover)：issue作文是，在emphasis on economic and international cooperation的今天，人们应把自己的role of ciziten放在world 里，而不是Particular country里;意思就是人们更应该把自己当成个世界公民而不是某个国家的公民。

　　原题：

　　With the increasing emphasis on a global economy and international cooperation, people need to understand that their role as citizens of the world is more important than their role as citizens of a particular country.

　　随着对全球经济和跨国公司的关注增加，人们需要理解他们作为世界公民的角色比作为一个特定国家的公民的角色更重要。

　　参考思路：

　　1. 两者并不是完全对立的环保

　　2.事实上两者可以相互促进一个人在一个国家做慈善工作很可能也会有一天为别的国家的人服务

　　3. 当两者冲突的时候哪个更重要取决与不同的情况。

• 有时,很多问题是全球性的,需要世界公民的角度考虑,而非只站在一国角度. 比如,环境问题,能源问题,等等.人们应该为整个地球负责任,而不仅仅是为了一个民族或国家. 因为, 如果是后者, 则很有可能只解决自己的问题, 而把危害转移到别的国家. shift the burden and threats from one nation to another…比如: 出口垃圾, 比如大量进口发展中国家的木材.虽然自己的国家暂时解决了问题,但长远看, 没有国家孤立地存在, 不能short-sight and narrow mind, 因为interdependent.
• 但这不意味着人们就要discard or weaken their role as citizens of one nation. 其实两者并不是incompatible, 更多时候, 可以作为complementary one—and can even be synergistic.比如the preservation of traditional culture, 人们作为一国公民,你保护自己独特文化的同时, 实际上也为全球的diversity of culture作出了positive fort. 比如,为一个国家的publicservice付出努力的同时,很可能激发起公民的社会责任感和compassion and responsibility,参与到国际public service 中, 比如很多charitarian 就开始从对本国的慈善事业subsidize the school in one nation也激发起对attention to the education in the international scope.

　　View1: people’s role as citizens of the world is become more and more important in the modern society.

　　View2: Without the awareness of being citizens of a particular country, people will find no roots to behave on the stage of the world.

　　View3: these two roles, national and international, are not mutually exclusive alternatives. They can be properly combined.

　　Optional words:代替取代supersede compatible be compatible with... citizenship domain This one person would be acting consistently as a citizen of community, state, nation and world. Admittedly, conflicting/clashing/discordant obligations sometimes arise as a result of our new dual citizenship. obligatory In sum, although our "dual" citizenship may at times lead to conflict, one role need not automatically take precedence over the other. more often than not The relationship between the two roles is, more often than not, a complementary one, and can even be synergistic. synergistic coactive complement complementary supplement

　　参考范文：

　　With the growth of the global economy and the need for international cooperation, every human being has assumed a role as citizen of the world. Does this mean that our roles as citizens of our respective nations are thereby superseded by our role as world citizens, as the speaker suggests? Not at all. Good citizenship at one level is often compatible with good citizenship at another. In fact, being a good citizen in one social domain can help one be a better citizen in another.

　　Good global citizenship is not incompatible with good citizenship at other levels. Consider, for example, one’s forts as a citizen to preserve the natural environment. One particular person might, for example: (1) lobby legislators to enact laws preserving an endangered redwood forest, (2) campaign for nationally-elected officials who support clean air laws, and (3) contribute to international rainforest (n. 雨林) preservation organizations. This one person would be acting consistently as a citizen of community, state, nation and world.

　　Admittedly, conflicting obligations sometimes arise as a result of our new “dual” citizenship. For example, a U.S. military official with an advisory role in a United Nations peace-keeping force might face conflicting courses of action—one that would secure U.S. military interests, and another that would better serve international interests. However, the fact that such a conflict exists does not mean that either action is automatically more obligatory—that is, that one’s role as either U.S. citizen or world citizen must invariably supersede the other. Instead, this situation should be resolved by carully considering and weighing the consequences of each course of action.

　　Moreover, being a good citizen in one social context can often help one be a better citizen in another. For example, volunteering to help underprivileged children in one’s community might inspire one to work for an international child-welfare organization. And inculcating civic values—such as charity and civic pride—may give rise to personal traits of character that transfer to all social domains and contexts.

　　In sum, although our “dual” citizenship may at times lead to conflicts, one role need not automatically take precedence over the other. Moreover, the relationship between the two roles is, more often than not, a complementary one—and can even be synergistic.

相关链接：

1.GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 5月7日更新（二十一）

2.GMAT作文精品模板推荐之AA篇(1)

3.GMAT作文经典案例集锦：成功