悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业,现居澳洲,在澳学习生活15+年,从事教育咨询工作超过10年,澳洲政府注册教育顾问,上千成功升学转学签证案例,定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
您所在的位置: 首页> 新闻列表> GMAT逻辑机经整理:在河边种树.
GMAT逻辑一向是考生比较头疼的地方,相关方面的资料也显得比较少,为此澳际小编特收集整理了1月30日GMAT逻辑机经整理,分享给大家,希望对大家有所帮助,文中观点仅供参考。
【本月原始】
逻辑还有道12月jj里面的题,就是岸边长得树该不该砍得那题
【本月原始】有个是河边种树的,有个地方农民依靠一条河的水灌溉且水资源不够用,现农民想把河边的树砍掉种庄稼,有人反对说不能砍树,因为树可以防止河里的水被太阳晒后蒸发掉,以免水更少了。题目好像是问加强吧,我选的是如果种种庄稼,庄稼不能保护水不被太阳蒸发吧
【综合题干】
In the arid land along the Colorado River, use of the river&aposs water supply is strictly controlled:farms along the river each have a limited allocation that they are allowed to use for irrigation.But the trees that grow in narrow strips along the river&aposs banks also use its water.Clearly, therore, if farmers were to remove those trees, more water would be available for crop irrigation.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.The trees along the river&aposs banks shelter it from the sun and wind, thereby greatly reducing the amount of water lost through evaporation.
B.Owners of farms along the river will probably not undertake the expense of cutting down trees along the banks unless they are granted a greater allocation of water in return.
C.Many of the tree species currently found along the river&aposs banks are specifically adapted to growing in places where tree roots remain constantly wet.
D.The strip of land where trees grow along the river&aposs banks would not be suitable for growing crops if the trees were removed.
E.The distribution of water allocations for irrigation is intended to prevent farms farther upstream from using water needed by farms farther downstream.
以上就是GMAT逻辑机经在河边种树的全部介绍,考生朋友可以自己推算一遍,最后再来验证答案,最后祝大家都能考出好成绩。
Amy GUO 经验: 16年 案例:4272 擅长:美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站(www.aoji.cn,刊载的所有内容,访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏,以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途,但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定,不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外,将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时,须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可,并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容,请及时通知本站,予以删除。