11月GMAT作文机经：在家工作出口Sugar.

　　十一月机经已经都放出来了，相信大家看了之后不难发现很多机经都不过是酒药换新汤罢了，所以大家要把握好这个规律。今天我们就来分享一下GMAT十一月作文机经，希望对大家备考GMAT考试有所帮助。

　　【原始】

　　Sacchar国家主要出口产品是sugar。为了decrease trade dict，他们决定降低sugar出口价格。这样子能够吸引更多的客户，export volume上升，赤字降低。

　　【原题】

　　The following appeared as part of an article in a weekly newsmagazine.

　　“The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade dicit problem by lowering the price of sugar, its primary export. Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar-exporting countries. The sale of Sacchar’s sugar abroad would increase, and this increase would substantially reduce Sacchar’s trade dicit.”

　　Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

　　【参考思路】

　　1. 比起价格下降而带来的损失产量提高的影响是不是更大不是定数Increasing sales by lowering the price of sugar will not yeild an increase in income unless the increase in sales is sufficient to overcome the loss in income due to the lower price. in the absence of ...

　　2. 可能性价比本来就很有竞争力了不需要降价，也可能价格已经很低了没有降低的空间了

　　3. 降低进口可能是一个更好的办法。A trade-dicit occurs when a country spends more on imports than it earns from exports. However, the author provides no evidence that substantiates this assumption. It is possible that revenues from imports will increase dramatically in the near future; if so, the course of action proposed by the author might be unnecessary to solve Sacchar&aposs trade dicit proplem. To the extent that this is the case...

　　【参考范文】

　　The author of this article argues that the country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade dicit problem by lowering the price of its main export, sugar. The line of reasoning is that this action would make Sacchar more competitive with other sugar-exporting countries, thereby increasing sales of Sacchar’s sugar abroad and, in turn, substantially reducing the trade-dicit. This line of reasoning is unconvincing for a couple of reasons.

　　In the first place, this argument is based on an oversimplified analysis of the trade dicit problem Sacchar currently faces. A trade-dicit occurs when a country spends more on imports than it earns from exports. The author’s argument relies on the assumption that earnings from imports will remain constant. However, the author provides no evidence that substantiates this assumption. It is possible that revenues from imports will increase dramatically in the near future; if so, the course of action proposed by the author might be unnecessary to solve Sacchar’s trade dicit problem. Conversely, it is possible that revenues from imports are likely to decrease dramatically in the near future. To the extent that this is the case, lowering sugar prices may have a negligible countervailing fect, depending on the demand for Sacchar’s sugar.

　　In the second place, increasing sales by lowering the price of sugar will not yield an increase in income unless the increase in sales is sufficient to overcome the loss in income due to the lower price. This raises three questions the author fails to address. First, will a price decrease in fact stimulate demand? Second, is demand sufficient to meet the increase in supply? Third, can Sacchar increase the sugar production sufficiently to overcome the dicit? In the absence of answers to these questions, we cannot assess the author’s proposal.

　　In conclusion, the author provides an incomplete analysis of the problem and, as a result, provides a questionable solution. To better evaluate the proposal, we would need to know how revenues from imports are likely to change in the future. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide evidence that demand is sufficient to meet the proposed increase in supply, and that Sacchar has sufficient resources to accommodate the increase.

　　还有更多关于GMAT机经的内容请关注澳际教育，澳际教育将第一时间将最新的GMAT机经分享给大家，同时也希望在考生们利用GMAT机经复习的同时，注重学习方法的总结，考出理想的成绩。