gre argument165提纲分析汇总.

　　前段时间为gre考生汇总了gre issue写作提纲思路和分析，希望对考生在攻破gre issue写作上有所帮助。接下来的几天我们将为gre考生整理gre argument部分的提纲内容。希望通过我们的整理和汇总，让gre考生真正能掌握gre写作的精髓。

　　难易程度：★★★

　　题目题材：健康卫生

　　gre argument 165题目：

　　The following appeared in a business magazine.

　　"As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna(1) be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk(5). This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans(2) and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea(4), five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals(3) are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."

　　提纲：

　　(1)We do not know how many tuna cans did Promofoods sell in total last year, thus could not evaluate if the eight million return cans are among the batch which caused the problems.

　　(2)We do not know if tuna cans are the only kind of food Promofoods sell last year, hence we could not evaluate if the test makes any sense.

　　(3)The author fails to rule out the possibility that it is the three remaining chemicals that resulted in the problem.

　　(4)The author generalizes too hastily that the tested cans do not contain any chemicals that pose a health risk at all.

　　(5)The chemists failed to examine the samples for other chemicals or substances that could cause dizziness and nausea.

　　注：题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

　　无论是gre issue还是gre argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。