gre argument222提纲分析汇总.

　　前段时间为gre考生汇总了gre issue写作提纲思路和分析，希望对考生在攻破gre issue写作上有所帮助。接下来的几天我们将为gre考生整理gre argument部分的提纲内容。希望通过我们的整理和汇总，让gre考生真正能掌握gre写作的精髓。

　　难易程度：★★★

　　题目题材：教育

　　gre argument 222题目：

　　The following article appeared in a recent issue of a college newspaper.

　　"Among all students who graduated from Hooper University over the past five years, more(1) physical science majors than social science majors found permanent jobs within a year of graduation(2). In a survey of recent Hooper University graduates(3), most physical science majors said they believed that the prestige of Hooper University&aposs physical science programs helped them significantly in finding a job. In contrast, social science majors who found permanent employment attributed their success to their own personal initiative(4). Therore, to ensure that social science majors find permanent jobs(5), Hooper University should offer additional social science courses and hire several new faculty members who already have national reputations in the social sciences."

　　提纲：

　　(1)We cannot evaluate the employment result because we do not know the base amount of students of these two majors.

　　(2)Without detailed conditions of the jobs found by students, e.g. the pay, working condition, their positions, etc., and the number of students who found permanent jobs after one year, we cannot conclude that the job-placement record of social science majors is comparatively poor.

　　(3)The author unfairly assumes that the graduates’ opinions could exactly rlect the university’s actual need.

　　(4)The author ignores many other factors that would contribute to the comparatively poor job-placement record of social science majors.

　　(5)The author’s proposal may be neither sufficient nor necessary for improving job-placement record of social science majors.

　　注：题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

　　无论是gre issue还是gre argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。