巧用新GRE写作模板来提分.

　　要想快速取得GRE写作高分，背诵GRE写作模版是最为快速便捷的一种方法了，以下是调查类、因果类和正负得失、外推、错误对比、非此即彼、无理假设方法的几种GRE写作模板，各位考生可以参考这些模板，来提高自己的写作水平。获得更多留学咨询请咨询澳际免费在线咨询顾问

　　史上最牛申请丛书免费呈现，为你罗列师哥师姐的申请经历!为你总结名校申请经验!更有名师为你解开申请密码，OFFER在向你招手! 名校大门为你敞开!→ 《谁说申请高手没有秘密》。

　　Merely based on unfounded assumptions and anecdotal evidences, the statement simply concludes that . To strengthen this conclusion, the arguer points out the evidence that . Additionally, he indicates that . Furthermore, he cites the result of a recent study in support of this recommendation. At the first glance, this argument appears to be somewhat forcul, but further rlection exposes that it omits some substantial concerns that should be addressed in the argument. From the logical perspective, this argument suffers from logical flaws.

　　To begin with, the threshold problem with this argument is that

　　Even if the were acceptable, another problem that weakens the logic of the argument is that

　　Even assuming that were convincing, in order to reasonably arrive at the author&aposs conclusion,

　　Bore I come to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out the last flaw involved in this argument.

　　To sum up, this arguer fails to illustrate his claim that , because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To make the argument more forcul, the author would have to provide more information with regard to . In addition, it is better for him to substantiate that . Therore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more thorough and logically acceptable.

　　调查类

　　Unless the surveyor sampled a sufficient number of and did so randomly across the entire spectrum, the results are not reliable to gauge generally. The number of respondents, in itself, does not ensure representativeness. For example, if the samples included only , (then the results would no doubt suggest....). Or if the grosses are considerable, (10000) would account for only a little percentage, which would render the result of the survey meaningless.

　　We are not informed whether the survey responses are anonymous, even confidential. If they were not, the result of the survey would give no support to the author&aposs point.

　　What&aposs more, the surveyor must be the cross-bencher/nonaligned, which was not mentioned as well.

　　The validity of the study is doubtful. Lacking information about and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. If, for instance, 200 professors were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that would be highly suspect. Because the letter offers no evidence that would rule out these interpretations, the results of the study are insufficient to support the conclusion.

　　Unless the surveyor sampled a sufficient number of and did so randomly across the entire spectrum, the result are not reliable to gauge generally. We are not informed whether the study responses are anonymous, even confidential. If they were not, the result of the survey would give no support to the author&aposs point. What&aposs more, the study conductor must be a cross-bencher, which was not mentioned either. Thus, the validity of the study is highly doubtful.

　　因果类

　　The editor&aposs recommendation depends on the assumption that no factors other than caused . However, common sense informs me that this assumption is a poor one. A myriad of other factors, including or , might be the cause of . To be specific, . Without ruling out these and other possible cause, this editor cannot justifiably conclude that only by can .

　　Based on the fact that A occurred after B, the editor infers that B should be responsible for A. However, the sequence of these events, in itself, doesn&apost suffice to prove that the earlier development caused the later one. It might have resulted from some other events instead: C,D,E----to just a few possibilities. Without ruling out scenarios such as these, the editor cannot establish a cause-and-recommendation depends.

　　The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the fact that and the claim that . It is highly possible that other factors contribute to B. For instance, B might have resulted from C. It is also likely that D caused B. Lacking evidence that links A to B, it is presumptuous to suggest that A was responsible for B. This argument is unacceptable unless there is compelling evidences to support the connection between these two events.

　　The argument observes a correlation between A and B, then concludes that the former is the cause of the latter. However, the argument fails to rule out other possible explanations for B. For example, . Any of these factors might lead to B. Without ruling out all other factors it is unfair to conclude that A is responsible for B.

　　正负得失

　　The author&aposs conclusion that is unwarranted. Profit is a factor relating to not only revenue, but also cost. It&aposs entirely possible that the cost of A, or other costs associated with B,C, will offset, even outweigh the revenue. Besides, a myriad of other unexpected occurrences, such as unfavorable economic depression, might prevent... from being as profitable as the argument predicts.

　　In addition, the author fails to consider the negative impacts brought about by (doing ).

　　外推

　　The author claims that ,because . This assumption is unwarranted because things rarely remain the same over extended period of time. There are likely all kinds of difference between past (nowadays) and (present) future. For example, it is widely known that there are no human beings on the earth 20000 years ago; however, nowadays human as the most evolved animal are developing the most advanced technology on the same earth. Any of these scenarios, if true, would serve to undermine the claim that .

　　错误对比

　　The author&aposs recommendation relies on what might be, between A and B, a poor analogy which falsely depends on the assumption that the situation in both of them are similar. It is, however, entirely possible that . In short, without accounting for such possible differences between A and B, the arguer cannot prove that B will reap the similar benits from the proposed method.

　　非此即彼

　　Even assuming A is not the reason for C, the author falsely assume that C must be attributable to B. This "either-or" argument is fallacious in that it ignores other possible causes of B. Perhaps D, or perhaps E.

　　The editorial seems to make two irreconcilable claims. One is that A; the other is B. However, this assumption presents a false dilemma, since A,B are not necessarily mutually exclusive alternatives.

　　无理假设

　　The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that . However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. It is most likely that, for example, . Therore, the argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.

列举签证的每个步骤与流程;细数签证的各种材料与要求;解答签证的常见问题与疑问，这是一本神奇的签证工具书→ 《玩转留学签证》

　　这些GRE写作模板只是帮助考生来走一种捷径，但是作文模板并不是万能的，要想取得GRE写作高分最根本的方法还是要靠自己努力学习，平时勤于练习写作，多积累优美的语句，学习一些新颖的写作手法，提高自己的写作水平。澳际留学相信只要努力付出就会有所收获!

　　经典文章推荐：

　　GRE作文可插入美国名言提升含金量

　　正确方法助你取得新GRE写作高分

　　新GRE写作妙用修辞手法

　　要想快速取得GRE写作高分，背诵GRE写作模版是最为快速便捷的一种方法了，以下是调查类、因果类和正负得失、外推、错误对比、非此即彼、无理假设方法的几种GRE写作模板，各位考生可以参考这些模板，来提高自己的写作水平。获得更多留学咨询请咨询澳际免费在线咨询顾问

　　史上最牛申请丛书免费呈现，为你罗列师哥师姐的申请经历!为你总结名校申请经验!更有名师为你解开申请密码，OFFER在向你招手! 名校大门为你敞开!→ 《谁说申请高手没有秘密》。

　　Merely based on unfounded assumptions and anecdotal evidences, the statement simply concludes that . To strengthen this conclusion, the arguer points out the evidence that . Additionally, he indicates that . Furthermore, he cites the result of a recent study in support of this recommendation. At the first glance, this argument appears to be somewhat forcul, but further rlection exposes that it omits some substantial concerns that should be addressed in the argument. From the logical perspective, this argument suffers from logical flaws.

　　To begin with, the threshold problem with this argument is that

　　Even if the were acceptable, another problem that weakens the logic of the argument is that

　　Even assuming that were convincing, in order to reasonably arrive at the author&aposs conclusion,

　　Bore I come to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out the last flaw involved in this argument.

　　To sum up, this arguer fails to illustrate his claim that , because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To make the argument more forcul, the author would have to provide more information with regard to . In addition, it is better for him to substantiate that . Therore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more thorough and logically acceptable.

　　调查类

　　Unless the surveyor sampled a sufficient number of and did so randomly across the entire spectrum, the results are not reliable to gauge generally. The number of respondents, in itself, does not ensure representativeness. For example, if the samples included only , (then the results would no doubt suggest....). Or if the grosses are considerable, (10000) would account for only a little percentage, which would render the result of the survey meaningless.

　　We are not informed whether the survey responses are anonymous, even confidential. If they were not, the result of the survey would give no support to the author&aposs point.

　　What&aposs more, the surveyor must be the cross-bencher/nonaligned, which was not mentioned as well.

　　The validity of the study is doubtful. Lacking information about and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. If, for instance, 200 professors were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that would be highly suspect. Because the letter offers no evidence that would rule out these interpretations, the results of the study are insufficient to support the conclusion.

　　Unless the surveyor sampled a sufficient number of and did so randomly across the entire spectrum, the result are not reliable to gauge generally. We are not informed whether the study responses are anonymous, even confidential. If they were not, the result of the survey would give no support to the author&aposs point. What&aposs more, the study conductor must be a cross-bencher, which was not mentioned either. Thus, the validity of the study is highly doubtful.

上123下

共3页