GRE Argument审题范例指导.

　　关于GRE Argument的审题指导。以下是澳际小编为大家整理的资料。希望对大家能有帮助，供参考。

　　【要点 1】看清结构，找准结论与论据。

　　有些 GRE 作文老师认为只能花 1min 迅速扫过题目，然后就开始写;然而，我并不赞成这一观点。欲速则不达，文章也有长短，看得太快理不清题目内容的结构，将使得整个写作过程缓慢而艰难，往往容易犯大错。建议把文章结构看清楚再开始写作，可以花 2min，千万不要慌，要镇定、从容!

　　看下面的例子：

　　ARGUMENT221 - The following appeared in the editorial section of a student newspaper.

　　"In a recent survey, most students who were studying beginning Russian gave higher course-evaluation ratings to classes taught by non-native Russian speakers than to classes taught by native Russian speakers. The reason that the non-native speakers were better teachers of Russian is easy to see: the non-native speakers learned Russian later in life themselves, and so they have a better understanding of how the language can be taught fectively. Therore, in order to improve instruction for all languages and also save money, our university should hire non-native speakers as language instructors instead of trying to find and recruit native speakers."

　　结论：Our university should hire non-native speakers as language instructors instead of trying to find and recruit native speakers, in order to improve instruction for all languages and also save money.

　　论据 1：In a recent survey, most students who were studying beginning Russian gave higher course-evaluation ratings to classes taught by non-native Russian speakers than to classes taught by native Russian speakers.

　　论据 2：The non-native speakers learned Russian later in life themselves, and so they have a better understanding of how the language can be taught fectively.

　　【要点 2】找出三个主要逻辑错误。

　　一般情况下， 通常可以找到三个主要逻辑错误(大于三个时把同类错误合并，或者舍弃不重要的错误;也有的题目可能只有两个错误)。

　　上面的例子中，可以分别针对两个论据各指出一个主要逻辑错误，然后针对结论再指出一个错误，这样三个错误各有所指，而且覆盖比较全面：

　　错误 1：Survey;

　　错误 2：Non-native speakers do not necessarily teach fectively;

　　错误 3：Hiring non-native speakers as language instructors would not necessarily improve instruction for all languages and also save money.

　　【要点 3】把几个逻辑错误进行逻辑排序。

　　按重要性排序;

　　按推理过程排序;

　　按文中出现顺序排序。

　　【要点 4】找出每个逻辑错误的反驳例子。

　　如果没有准备过某个题目， 那么写该题时举反驳的例子将是最耗费时间的工作，时间太少很可能举的例子不够合适，难以具备相应的说服力;因此，准备好反驳例子是提纲准备时的重要工作。

　　上面的例子中：

　　错误 1：Survey 可以像其他很多题目中的 Survey 一样进行攻击，结合题目本身对 Survey 中的攻击点稍作变动即可; 而错误 2 和 3 就需要举出合适的例子。

　　错误 2：可能其他很多方面影响语言老师的教学水平，比如对某语言的文化背景的理解程度，本土老师有更深刻的理解，可以让学生对所学语言更加了解。

　　错误 3：就算 Russian 语言是非本土老师教得好，其他语言不一定，可能本土没有人精通德语;就算所有语言的非本土老师都教得更好，不一定节约钱可能呢些非本土老师仗着自己教得更好，就要求更高的工资。