悉尼大学商学国贸双硕士毕业,现居澳洲,在澳学习生活15+年,从事教育咨询工作超过10年,澳洲政府注册教育顾问,上千成功升学转学签证案例,定期受邀亲自走访澳洲各类学校
您所在的位置: 首页> 新闻列表> 雅思作文题目:技术对贫富差异的影响.
雅思作文科技类话题,作文略有难度。下面是庄子老师的雅思作文题目范文,供大家拓展思路实用。雅思考试中,雅思写作忌照抄范文。
�
自吹自擂的讲评:
�
庄子同学的这些即兴习作, 虽不及毛姆散文的幽默和隽美, 但是内里透露着庞大而有严密的逻辑推理, 逻辑结构背后是一颗深邃的心, 净若深渊, 透澈但不见渊底, 体现在表面的文字, 却是质朴简约, 似乎毫无雕饰之痕.宛若一滩清溪, 欢畅淋漓, 淙淙悦耳.
�
2009年1月10日考题 技术对贫富差异的影响.
�
关键词: 技术和 贫富差异
�
题目:
�
Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich. Others think it is having an opposite fect. Discuss these points of view. What is your opinion?
�
范文:276 单词
�
The gap between the rich and the poor has been a problem that human beings put forts to solve. One approach is to develop various technologies and techniques. Automobiles, for instance, are supposed to free those who use their physical power to move objects or people. However, the developments of technologies are said to increase the gap.
�
Those who claim that technologies have played important roles in decreasing the gaps between the have and the have-not are correct, only partly, because they see the issue with too enthusiastic eyes. They pay much attention to the power of technologies but seldom focus on the social elements that keep technologies from being truly positive to human well being. For example, the mobile phones as a new technology should greatly emancipate people from low fective paper and pencil pattern of communication. However, this technology has not played its supposed roles because mobile phones are totally controlled by the few haves in the society. In China, it is the CMCC which is believed to be profiteer without much human nature.
�
However, those who entirely attribute the increasing gaps between the rich and the poor to the development of technologies are also not convincing. They, like those discussed above, fail to see that it is not technologies but the distribution systems of the social resources that account much more. In any human societies, it is not the resources per se, but the political, economic, and even religious fabrics, that finally dictate how many and however poor or rich its population is.
�
In conclusion, the development of technology bears no direct cause-fect relationship with the gap between the rich and the poor.
�
�
�
本文来源于庄子老师
Amy GUO 经验: 16年 案例:4272 擅长:美国,澳洲,亚洲,欧洲
本网站(www.aoji.cn,刊载的所有内容,访问者可将本网站提供的内容或服务用于个人学习、研究或欣赏,以及其他非商业性或非盈利性用途,但同时应遵守著作权法及其他相关法律规定,不得侵犯本网站及相关权利人的合法权利。除此以外,将本网站任何内容或服务用于其他用途时,须征得本网站及相关权利人的书面许可,并支付报酬。
本网站内容原作者如不愿意在本网站刊登内容,请及时通知本站,予以删除。