SAT作文素材:Normative social influence.

SAT考试作文素材分享:Normative social influence Normative social influence occurs when one conforms to be liked or accepted by the members of the group. It usually results in public compliance, doing or saying something without believing in it. There are various motives behind this, including personal survival strategy in a community. Solomon E. Asch was the first psychologist to study this phenomenon in the laboratory. He conducted a modification of Sherif’s study, assuming that when the situation was very clear, conformity would be drastically reduced. He exposed people in a group to a series of lines, and the participants were asked to match one line with a standard line. All participants except one were secretly told to give the wrong answer in 12 of the 18 trials. The results showed a surprisingly high degree of conformity. 76% of the participants conformed on at least one trial. On average people conformed one third of the time.[6] However, in a reinterpretation of the original data from these experiments Hodges and Geyer (2006)[7] found that Asch&aposs subjects were not so conformist after all: The experiments provide powerful evidence for people&aposs tendency to tell the truth even when others do not. They also provide compelling evidence of people&aposs concern for others and their views.[8]:2 By closely examining the situation in which Asch&aposs subjects find themselves they find that the situation places multiple demands on participants: They include truth (i.e., expressing one&aposs own view accurately), trust (i.e., taking seriously the value of others&apos claims), and social solidarity (i.e., a commitment to integrate the views of self and others without deprecating either). In addition to these epistemic values, there are multiple moral claims as well: These include the need for participants to care for the integrity and well-being of other participants, the experimenter, themselves, and the worth of scientific research.[8]:5

Normative influence, a function of social impact theory, has three components.[9] The number of people in the group has a surprising fect. As the number increases, each person has less of an impact. A group&aposs strength is how important the group is to a person. Groups we value generally have more social influence. Immediacy is how close the group is in time and space when the influence is taking place. Psychologists have constructed a mathematical model using these three factors and are able to predict the amount of conformity that occurs with some degree of accuracy.[10] Baron and his colleagues conducted a second eyewitness study that focused on normative influence.[4] In this version, the task was easier. Each participant had five seconds to look at a slide instead of just one second. Once again, there were both high and low motives to be accurate, but the results were the reverse of the first study. The low motivation group conformed 33% of the time (similar to Asch&aposs findings). The high motivation group conformed less at 16%. These results show that when accuracy is not very important, it is better to get the wrong answer than to risk social disapproval. An experiment using procedures similar to Asch&aposs found that there was significantly less conformity in six-person groups of friends as compared to six-person groups of strangers.[11] Because friends already know and accept each other, there may be less normative pressure to conform in some situations. Field studies on cigarette and alcohol abuse, however, generally demonstrate evidence of friends exerting normative social influence on each other.

SAT考试作文素材分享:Normative social influence Normative social influence occurs when one conforms to be liked or accepted by the members of the group. It usually results in public compliance, doing or saying something without believing in it. There are various motives behind this, including personal survival strategy in a community. Solomon E. Asch was the first psychologist to study this phenomenon in the laboratory. He conducted a modification of Sherif’s study, assuming that when the situation was very clear, conformity would be drastically reduced. He exposed people in a group to a series of lines, and the participants were asked to match one line with a standard line. All participants except one were secretly told to give the wrong answer in 12 of the 18 trials. The results showed a surprisingly high degree of conformity. 76% of the participants conformed on at least one trial. On average people conformed one third of the time.[6] However, in a reinterpretation of the original data from these experiments Hodges and Geyer (2006)[7] found that Asch&aposs subjects were not so conformist after all: The experiments provide powerful evidence for people&aposs tendency to tell the truth even when others do not. They also provide compelling evidence of people&aposs concern for others and their views.[8]:2 By closely examining the situation in which Asch&aposs subjects find themselves they find that the situation places multiple demands on participants: They include truth (i.e., expressing one&aposs own view accurately), trust (i.e., taking seriously the value of others&apos claims), and social solidarity (i.e., a commitment to integrate the views of self and others without deprecating either). In addition to these epistemic values, there are multiple moral claims as well: These include the need for participants to care for the integrity and well-being of other participants, the experimenter, themselves, and the worth of scientific research.[8]:5 上12下

共2页